![]() "Ju" is typically translated to "softness." Jujitsu is commonly translated as "Soft fighting style," and you see that in its focus on strikes towards sensitive regions (which means you can use less force and still accomplish your goal). Your art is an interesting one that shows the balance the Japanese look for. It's more a question of how they are balanced. The -do's have a tendency to seek inner growth more than the -jutsus, which seek more outer power, though don't pretend for an instant that either group of arts don't have both aspects. The -do suffix is typically translated as "the way of _." The -jutsu suffixed arts are more focused on combat and how to survive in a real fight situation. It is considered more of a -do art, even though it doesn't actually end in that syllable). Nothing ever survives translation, but one can generally categorize Japanese martial arts by whether they end in -jutsu or -do (Karate being a special case because of its linege. Some of what you are looking for is in what you mentioned in your answer: Jujitsu is a combat system. But beware of the effectiveness of dirty techniques that you can't verify against resisting opponents. In summary, yes, jujitsu has historically had more dirty techniques because it is not a sport or designed for free practice. I would think it would be easier to put your fingers in their eyes, bash their nose, or grab their ears. The nose holes are small and if the other person is moving, this seems like an attack with low success rate. I don't have the context for trying to put fingers up someone else's nose, but this seems like a gimmick. I am not trying to say anything about judo and jujitsu today the point is that techniques that were well practiced won against techniques that were not as well practiced. Judo won handily because its students trained randori (free practice, not prearranged). In the 1880's there was a competition between the dominant jujitsu schools of the time and judo. At the time, many of the jujitsu schools held the opinion that "our techniques are too dangerous to be practiced on people" - they were dirty. ![]() When judo was founded, Jigaro Kano put a lot of thought into what techniques he thought were effective versus what could be trained without injuring people. ![]() Also in the context of these rules, a real fight will be dirty because there may be punching, kicking, grabbing, and certainly no one is going to stop if they get behind you or the fight goes to the ground.Ĭonsider, however, that just because a technique is "dirty", it does not mean the technique is also effective against uncooperative partners, or that you are sufficiently trained for it to be so. Boxing - you can't hit people from behind, kick people, or push on the handsįrom the point of view of any of these sports, the other sports are dirty.Many of these rules make no sense in a real fighting situation. These are generally safety related for competition, although there may be other origins as well. Rules are part of the sport aspect of martial arts. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |